Book Review by Charles Brooks
The world is different now. The nation is different now. There is no returning
back to normal. The corona pandemic
unleashed waves of misery, suffering and indescribable loss of jobs,
healthcare, businesses, and life. A
public health crisis of unforeseen magnitude triggered a crisis in the national
economy that set-in motion a series of events affecting the entire country in
one way or another. In the midst of this pandemic, the nation witnessed regular
working-class folks forced to shelter in place and social distance or compelled
to work due to their “essential worker” status. We also witnessed their response
to the broken systems, failed institutions and meaningless slogans that failed
them, miserably. And then George Floyd was killed by the police sparking massive
protests in the US and around the world.
The protests revealed there was more than just an appetite for activism but
a deeper virulent hunger for radicalism when the people saw change but sought
transformation instead.
Marc Lamont Hill writes a book that
helps us to make sense about what is going on and what is needed to realize what
he calls the abolitionist vision. A vision sustained by the possibilities and
hope for the future with what he describes as transformative solutions. We Still Here explores the themes of pandemic,
policing, protests and possibilities through a lens of a radicalism that links
his analysis of white supremacy, racial capitalism and neoliberalism with race,
class, and gender identities.
The book starts and end with essays
by Hill; the first - his own personal journey navigating around Covid-19, his
father and the protests, and the second, an essay on the abolitionist future. In between, Hill is joined by
French activist Frank Barat in a question/answer format where Barat asks a
number of questions around the pandemic, policing, and the massive public
uprising.
Responding to questioning about social
distancing and sheltering in place, Hill brings a race/class perspective as he
makes the argument that “economic power enables social distance”. He describes
the emergence of corona capitalism as
an “aggressive articulation” of Naomi Klein’s thesis on disaster capitalism in
her book, Shock Doctrine; The Rise of
Disaster Capitalism. Hill says, “Human crises are exploited by the by the
powerful who coordinate with governments to create policies that enable them to
profit during such moments.” Here, Hill frames his response around neoliberalism,
racial capitalism and white supremacy outlining the poor financial health of
hospitals, the contradictions of the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) while individual/corporate
wealth exploded. He argues the emergence of corona capitalism has expedited the
consolidation of privatized power and uses Amazon as an example. Here, Hill
talks about Amazon’s influence and ability to shape public policy and their unique
position to maximize profits during the pandemic.
“In the United States, there has
always a been a relationship between disposability and confinement. Our
willingness to consign people to spaces of confinement is directly related to
our assessment of their economic value.
This assessment is informed by the logics of White supremacy,
patriarchy, and capitalism,” says Hill.
His analysis of the pandemic includes what he describes as the spaces of
confinement and the politics of disposability.
Hill focuses on the most vulnerable – the imprisoned, the jailed,
nursing homes and immigrant detention facilities, highlighting the “callous
sacrifice of life that informs attitudes and decisions that render them
disposable.” He also grapples with the
use of language, making a critical – and political – distinction comparing the use of rebellion versus riot, and Black Lives Matter versus All Black Lives Matter.
Although Hill explains the
significance of All Black Lives Matter movement, he discussed more about what
BLM is not compared to what it is, lamenting on his only concern – cooptation.
He does make the argument that it would be a mistake to frame 2013 BLM and 2020 BLM
as two different movements or even two iterations of the same movement. But Hill didn’t extend his response to specify
the appropriate frame in which to view 2020 BLM or make a clear distinction
between BLM and Movement for Black Lives. This is where the books’ question/answer
format limited Hill’s response because here, follow-up questions were needed to
expand or clarify Hill’s analysis on BLM.
While this is subjective to the individual reader, the book’s core analysis
nevertheless remains intact.
Hill discusses black politics as
well as his critique of former president Obama, but Barat asks no questions
about the 2020 presidential campaign. In his opening essay, Hill indicates his focus being on the
pandemic, this unprecedented period of immense crisis and despair that compels clarity
and analysis. Hill does exactly that
with, We Still Here, “It’s not enough to respond to Donald Trump’s
incompetence or the extraordinary grief that people are living with in a time
of pandemic. We must come to understand
everything that brought us here. This is
what young organizers in the streets are demanding. This is what everyone living in the time of
pandemic, policing, protest, and possibility must reckon with.”
Related Posts:
Book Review: Black Detroit by Herb Boyd, A Conversation about Black Detroit in Black New York
Book Review: Democracy in Black by Eddie Glaude, American Democracy, White Supremacy and Racism.
Please support and visit The Brooks Blackboard's website, our INTEL page, OPEN MIND page.
On social media, Please LIKE and FOLLOW our Facebook page.
