By Charles Brooks
The triumvirate of political leadership
in Baltimore City has
proposed controversial legislation in their tough
approach to address the rising crime and murder rate. On July 14
th, Mayor Catherine
Pugh, City Council President Bernard Young and Police Commissioner Kenneth
Davis were joined by a group of supporters in
announcing the proposed measure. “We
are proposing that we will make it a misdemeanor crime punishable by a
mandatory sentence of one year and a fine of
$1000 for possessing an illegal
handgun within 100 yards of a school, church, a public building or a place of
public assembly, said Mayor Pugh. She cited the need for the proposal by
offering the following crime data: a gun was used in
90% of murders; nearly
half of the
184 victims of crime have been arrested for a crime involving a
handgun; and in 2016
60% of years imposed through sentencing was
suspended. Current state law calls for a 30-day minimum
sentence eligible for suspension.
There are plans for additional
proposals to the state General Assembly to impose even stiffer penalties for
illegal gun possession in Baltimore City such as an upgrade to a felony. “…we’re going to ask them to push this
forward and we will not stop until we get the law that says 5 years minimal
penalty…” asserted Council President Young. The police commissioner dismissed
concerns about criminal justice: “This isn’t about mass incarceration or
locking up more people. It is about
holding the right people accountable and putting the right people in jail.”
Although the mayor contends that this
measure is just “one step” – there were several steps taken before this
one. For one, the commissioner was
unsuccessful last year to get similar legislation passed by the General
Assembly. Just last month in apparent
frustration, Commissioner Davis
announced that every patrol officer, detective,
and administrative officers will put on uniforms and begin patrolling the
streets in 12 hour shifts. There was also the
mobile forensic unit borrowed from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives for immediate identification of repeat offenders and to build cases for sentencing.
Less than a year ago, the
Gun Violence Enforcement Unit was created with the mission to get more convictions.
At the time, Baltimore State Attorney Marilyn Mosby said: "to ensure the aggregation of
intelligence that's extracted from my criminal strategies unit and the
Baltimore Police Department is used to not only apprehend and charge, but to
convict those who are administering gun violence in the city." In addition, there are the
remnants from the former Mayor Sheila Dixon's term in office ten years ago such as GunStat, a gun task force and the gun offender registry. There is also the myriad of issues surrounding the
defunct jail system.
Meanwhile in light of the current climate around
policing, this controversial proposal has certainly ignited debate and
criticism. There are op-eds expressing outrage, activists and community leaders
are alarmed while media reports indicate that several members of the Baltimore
City Council are not in support of the measure. Adam Jackson, the CEO of the
Leaders of a Beautiful Struggle (LBS) had this to say about the proposal: “We
think this bill is a tremendously short-sighted approach to stemming violence
in Baltimore. This “one-size-fits-all” approach leads to severe unintended
consequences e.g. targeting those trying to protect themselves as opposed to
violent criminals, constructive possession traps innocent people who had
nothing to do with the weapon, etc.
Jackson continues, “Cases will be pled out to
lower sentences not because of weak prosecutors/judges but because of bad
policing.” Jackson also pointed out that Baltimore City has not invested in
black people around the anti-violence movement in Baltimore, citing examples
such as the Baltimore Cease Fire movement, or Safe Streets Baltimore or the
Kujichagulia Center.
Discussion Question
There is an 18 year old, who was recently arrested for illegal firearm possession. He was in a car with two other people, in the back seat when the car was stopped and pulled over. The arresting police officer stopped the car because he smelled marijuana from the car. When the officer searched the car, he found a loaded .22 hand gun under the drivers seat. He was searched and no drugs or weapons were found - nothing illegal at all was found. He was arrested on two counts of illegal firearm possession and denied $10,000 bail despite no criminal history. If the proposed legislation was in place - he would spend a year in jail.
What are your thoughts about this case - should he have to spend a year in jail considering the circumstances, i.e., no criminal history, nothing found from search, etc.
Update:
The initial proposal has been amended to apply mandatory sentences on the second offense with a gun or in connection with violent crime.
Further Reading
